Sebastian Coe says doping claims a ‘declaration of war’

LONDON, ENGLAND - JULY 19:  Reliving the Olympic spirit: Sebastian Coe addresses the crowd at the curtain-raiser to Join In Summer 2013 - Go Local, at the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park  on July 19, 2013 in London, England.  (Photo by Ben A. Pruchnie/Getty Images for Go Local)
LONDON, ENGLAND – JULY 19: Reliving the Olympic spirit: Sebastian Coe addresses the crowd at the curtain-raiser to Join In Summer 2013 – Go Local, at the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park on July 19, 2013 in London, England. (Photo by Ben A. Pruchnie/Getty Images for Go Local)

London, Aug 5, 2015 (AFP) – New doping claims against athletics are a “declaration of war” on the sport, British Olympic great and International Association of Athletics Federations Sebastian Coe said on Wednesday.

“The fightback has to start here,” said Coe in a statement after the Sunday Times and German broadcaster ARD published evidence of hundreds of allegedly suspicious blood tests.

“It is a declaration of war on my sport. There is nothing in our history of competence and integrity in drug-testing that warrants this kind of attack.”

Coe, a two-time Olympic gold medallist at 1,500m, is vying with former Ukrainian pole-vaulter Sergey Bubka to succeed Lamine Diack, the head of world governing body the IAAF, in an election on Aug. 19.

The doping claims came to light following the leak of an IAAF database.

It allegedly shows details of over 12,000 blood tests between 2001 and 2012 that revealed “extraordinary” levels of doping, with over 800 athletes producing suspicious blood tests.

The IAAF dismissed the allegations on Tuesday as “sensationalist and confusing” and said the test results did not constitute concrete proof of doping.

While Coe, currently an IAAF vice-president, has attacked the claims, he accepts that some countries need to address longstanding concerns over doping practices.

“I don’t think anybody should underestimate the anger that is felt in our sport. We have led the way on this,” he told BBC Radio 4.

“To suggest that in some way we sit on our hands at best, and at worst are complicit in a cover-up, is not borne out by anything we have done in the last 15 years.”

The 58-year-old added: “As a sport we have led the way on out-of-competition testing, on accredited laboratories; we were the first sport to have arbitration panels.

“Yes, we have countries out there that are causing a problem and an inordinate amount of difficulty across our sport, but to say we are not investigating or turning a blind eye to this could not be further from the truth.”

Six-time world champion Bubka, 51, has called for athletics to stiffen its resolve against the scourge of doping.

“Athletics is the most fundamental of all sports and the way the world sees athletics influences the way it views all sports,” he said in a statement, without directly addressing the new allegations.

He called for the current anti-doping system to be “simplified”, saying it was “too complex and takes too long”.

Meanwhile, the Sunday Times has released a statement questioning the IAAF’s commitment to rooting out drug cheats.

“It is disingenuous of the IAAF to spend just two days conducting what it describes as a ‘thorough’ investigation into the serious issues we raised and then to attempt to dismiss the story as sensationalist,” the newspaper said.

The paper added: “Its refusal to accept any criticism raises serious questions as to whether the IAAF is truly committed to its primary duty of policing its sport and protecting clean athletes.”

The two experts who investigated the data for the Sunday Times, Michael Ashenden and Robin Parisotto, said they stood by their claims.

“We note the concerns raised by the IAAF with regard to the analyses we undertook of the data. We have rebutted each and every one of their so-called ‘serious reservations’,” they said in a joint-statement.

“We followed the same procedure as IAAF expert panelists when reviewing athlete biological passport profiles, classifying results as ‘likely doping’ when we were able to confidently exclude all other potential causes or instead ‘suspicious’ when there was genuine evidence of blood manipulation however further investigation such as target testing would have been required.

“We stand by the evaluations we submitted to Sunday Times and ARD/WDR.”

Check out the latest buyer's guide:

Best trail running gear for spring 2024

Explore our favourite trail running gear for short trips and longer treks, from watches to gaiters